How Liberals Tactics are Destroying our Country!

If you consider this information helpful or important- Please take a moment to SHARE!!

How Liberal Leader’s Tactics are Destroying American

I firmly believe that most democratic voters aren’t aware of what’s happening… but shouldn’t everyone know!   Below is EXACTLY how the Rules for Radicals have been and continue to be used to destroy the U.S.  As partisan as the following below paragraph may appear, as will be proven below, it is 100% accurate.  

*No Honesty, No Integrity… policies that are always destructive!  A Never ending stream of agendas that at their core are never anything  other than a quest for the acquisition and maintenance of pure, unadulterated power;  power at any cost, no matter who or what it destroys… Even if it means destroying the American Way of Life!   My question to all Americans, HOW CAN ANYONE, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, SUPPORT THIS PARTY?*
Rules for Radicals (Said rules are below; and on which Obama actually taught a college course), was the inspiration for Cloward-Piven’s theory for societal change that was fundamentally to overburden existing government so that you can then properly rebuild it…  

DESTROY CAPITALISM? How or Why would anyone  want to do that?

In a nutshell, the underlying principle of the Cloward-Piven Strategy is to so overload the entitlement system – to add so many to the entitlement rolls, that the country’s economic system collapses, unleashing chaos and violence in the streets, thus affecting radical Leftist political change in government. Basically, the objective is to tear the American system down to the ground, so it can rebuilt as a socialist Utopia.  If a Utopia were possible, I’d be on board!… But in the history of the world, liberal policies have never achieved the intended results.  We see the real world results of these ideas in action right now, all over the world;  in Greece and all  over Europe.  They alwas end the same way!  see…   

Could that really the objective of Obama?  What about Hillary?  She did do her thesis on Saul Alinsky, who authored “Rules for Radicals”.   The Rules, is basically a play book of tactics required to bring this chaos to reality.  It is a treatise with a very specific set of rules created not for effective debate but for effective lies, spin and obfuscation.  That is the LIBERAL WAY.   Rules for Radicals are below.

Whether because of his fundamental philosophy or due to a purposeful desire to implement the Cloward-Piven agenda, the fact is that Obama’s actions are uncomfortably similar to what would we would expect if one were intending to put Cloward-Piven into action.  Is this coincidence?  Maybe…

  • But… What was one of the very first things Obama did upon election?  
    •   *  Put out public relations ads letting everyone know, they might qualify for food stamps and other government benefits.  (Remember, Cloward-Piven? …overload the entitlement system)
    •   * He gutted and reversed the welfare reform laws that were implemented under Bill Clinton. Those reforms had actually helped millions get off the public dole and substantially balanced federal budget deficits. These changes helped the welfare rolls to drop by half and the poverty levels for black children reached their lowest levels in history!   Then Obama reversed it.  Why?   (Remember, Cloward-Piven? …overload the entitlement system)
    •   * Pushed to repeatedly extend unemployment benefits  (Remember, Cloward-Piven? …overload the entitlement system) to the degree that many people actually became unemployable because technology had so far passed them by.  Their skills were no longer of value in the ever evolving work place.  If they can no longer get a job?  Welfare! Who do people who rely on government checks usually vote for??  The liberal goal is never good policy, it’s always power and control.(Remember, Cloward-Piven? …overload the entitlement system). 
    •   *  Signed Numerous Unconstitutional Executive actions, keeping our borders open and now granting amnesty to millions of illigal/undocumented immigrants, who will qualify for US services and entitlements?  (Remember, Cloward-Piven? …overload the entitlement system).

I could continue to name more and more Obama policies that were right out of the Rules for Radicals and Cloward-Piven Hand book.

  • BUT IT’S ACTUALLY EVEN WORSE… Look at the world Obama and Hillary have helped to create….
    • *  A WEAK US and an international power vacuum that’s allowing the tyrant’s to take control.  Russia, Iran, etc..
    • *  A RESURGENCE of worldwide terrorism (Isis), that basically is now creating it’s own borders, complete with oil money to become even more powerful and dangerous.  Our men and women bled and died to bring the stability that Obama and Hillary threw away because neither would listen to the generals advice to keep a minimal US presence to keep things under control.   Our brave men and women died to bring a the victory that was at hand… then Obama snatching defeat from the jaws of that victory! 
    • *  We have a more dangerous US because our government has slipped back to a PRE-911 mindset.  TERRORISM isn’t an issue in the US… we just have “workplace violence”
    • *  A HEALTHCARE SYSTEM with fewer doctors, even more rapidly rising premiums than previously, people being thrown off their health plans by the millions even though we were promised “you can keep your plan, you can keep your doctor”.  
           After the elections, it will be even worse.  Remember, Obama extended the most destructive part of the law (re corporations compliance), until after elections. 
    • *  BUDGET DEFICITS– the likes of which have never been seen in the history of mankind.
    • *  LIES about the state of the economy and the severity of unemployment problems.  see… and… 
    • *  SCANDAL AFTER SCANDAL AND LIE AFTER LIE… Benghazi, Fast and Furious, IRS targeting, NSA unprecedented privacy violations, Destruction of our balance of powers through UNCONSTITUTIONAL executive orders, VA Scandal, I could go on and on… 

*Directly from the Congressional CBO as of 8-23-16* 
As of 8-23-16 we now have reached the highest level of debt relative to our economy in the *history of our country!*  This is in spite of the fact that we are one of the heaviest taxed countries in the world!  

Hear are a few additional little known FACTS.
1. The top 5% of earners already pay over 50% of all federal taxes.  Most that yell “fair share” are not aware of this or fact 2 or 3.
2. The top 20% of earners pay almost 70% of all federal taxes.
3. The BOTTOM 43% pay ZERO taxes and the bottom 50% pay almost ZERO federal taxes.
Based on the facts… If one is truly concerned about the rich paying their “fair share“, I don’t think a tax INCREASE would be the conclusion or policy of most.  It would be hard to make argument that they don’t already do so.    


Our associations, our choices, say something about us.   Failure to acknowledge this is to be in denial.  This truth applies to everyone, even our president.

Is all of this just coincidence?  

When reading about the “RULES”, pay special attention to Rules #5 and #12 that I’ve previewed for you below.  You’ve seen them before, actually you are seeing them in action right now… Just turn on the TV.

If you were to analyze virtually any political controversy or debate, you will hear the liberal spouting some combination of this rule… Virtually, irrespective of what the discussion is! 
* Against, tax increases? Conservatives just want to protect the rich at the expense of the poor.
* Want to balance the budget? Conservatives don’t care about the poor.
* Want to protect our borders? Conservatives are racists.

*No matter the nature of the policy, turn it into an attack!*
Even the most noble of goals or policies are used against the political opponent, if at all possible. How? Just lie about it!
A prime example:
Do you remember that in the presidential campaign, in which, Mitt Romney compiled a list _contained in a folder_, of scores of qualified women to fill important positions within his administration? His goal was to lead the charge for women’s equality. Honestly, is there anything at all improper with this goal? Of course not!
*What did the Dems do?*
They used it as if he were berating, diminishing and even objectivizing women! All you heard from the democratic leaders was a constant refrain of accusations regarding the disgusting and improper “Romney’s folder full of women”! *they used his goal to lift women up, as a sledge hammer to knock him down!* THAT IS WHAT DEMS AND THE ALINSKY METHODS DO!

*Rule #12* “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” It’s hard to argue your case, when you are forced to defend your character or defend your freedom in court.   Interestingly, Obama taught a course on “Rules for Radical” at Harvard. I assume the similarity between his style and the “Rules” is just a coincidence?  Hillary wrote her thesis on it.  Do you think they are above using these despicable tactics?

*Think about it*… How many republican leaders can you think of that were hit with charges of immorality, misconduct, illegality, or even an actual indictment just prior to an important election??? Then later have the charges dismissed, found not guilty, acquitted or overturned on appeal… *after the election???*  Does this sound familiar? 
We often see liberal prosecutors creating empty, trumped up charges and allegations against conservative politicians and leaders prior to an election. The charges don’t stick, and are ”usually” tossed out of court… but the stink  of the election lingers just long enough for the liberals get another win based on lies.

*Here are a few more examples of this rule in action:*
*Ted Stevens Alaska*. Had multiple charges of fraud and abuse of funds brought against him and endured an actual wrongful conviction a scant 2 weeks prior to the election. His conviction was then overturned after it was found the prosecutors had engaged in “_the systematic withholding of exculpatory evidence_” that *showed the allegations were false and that they allowed false testimony to be presented at trial*. Their actions were so egregious that the judge actually held the prosecutors in contempt of court and found guilty of “reckless professional misconduct”… but they were not fired! *The decision to not fire was made by the _Obama_ Justice Department*.
Yes, the conviction was overturned, but not before Stevens lost his long held Senate seat to a Democrat. The defeat of Stevens and his replacement with a Democrat was instrumental in the passage of Obama Care. *How convenient?!*

*Bob Packwood Oregon*– rightfully had issues due to minor sexual harassment. But Republicans forced him to resign. (isn’t that what Dems do with their bad apples?). NOT– Clinton had engaged in serial sexual harassment, lying under oath, allegations of rape… the democrats didn’t just continue to support him, they continually pretended it was nothing and was just about personal sex. See the irony? *I mean hypocrisy?*  For liberals, only the retention of power matters.

*Sarah Palin Alaska*– Immediately after becoming the running mate of John McCain in 2008 was hit with 14 various ethics charges. (Quite a coincidence?). Eventually she was acquitted of every single one of them!  But the election was lost… Sound Familiar? 

*Tom Delay*- House Majority Leader. After a failed attempt to indict, the second attempt was successful because the attorneys came in with “additional evidence”. Delay was convicted of money laundering and conspiracy charges; then acquitted due to egregious prosecutorial misconduct. This speaks volumes to the “new evidence”.  the charges were bogus, but it cost the Republicans one of their most effective leaders.  Again, right and wrong do not matter… only power matters to liberals.

*Kay Bailey Hutchinson*- Texas Senator was indicted and the case against her imploded as the judge decided the case was so bad he kicked it out of the court room.

Governor Rick Perry charged with “abuse of power” because of a Veto…(district attorney didn’t get what she wanted so she indicted the governor). It was overturned in 2016.

DONALD TRUMP- Isn’t quite a coincidence that 20 years after the fact, women are coming out of the woodwork to say TRUMP basically abused them?  I wonder why they are all coming out now???  Could someone be paying them or promising them something, like fame and fortune?  Surely not!  That would be dishonest, wouldn’t it?  Why now.  I guess i’m a dunce, I just don’t get it.

The point is… the democratic party and its leaders are hypocrites with little care for honesty, “good policy” or integrity… (Note: I say “good policy”, because they are not stupid. They have to know what works and doesn’t…  History has proven what works and what doesn’t.  See  and  How liberal policies caused the financial meltdown.    …but often, what works, doesn’t garner as many votes…  and as I think we’ve established, it’s all about the votes.

Speaking of Votes… Does voter fraud exist?  Liberals say no… Why?  

This doesn’t mean I believe conservatives are perfect. But you don’t see the above in their playbook. And, for anyone who cares, No Bill Clinton is not an example of a false unwarranted accusation. He was fined $90,000 and lost his license to practice law because of his perjury regarding Monica Lewinski.

*No Honesty, No Integrity… consistent agendas that have at their core nothing other than a quest for the acquisition and maintenance of pure, unadulterated power. My question to all Americans, HOW CAN AMERICAN, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, SUPPORT THIS PARTY?*


Although, all of these disingenuous tactics are used, From what I’ve seen, the most despicable and widely used is #12.
Pay attention to liberal politicians arguments and that #12 is the norm.  Ignore the facts, just attack and ridicule the enemy.

* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people. It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)  EDITOR’S NOTE:  The idea is basically to use their desire to do the right thing against them!  Do you remember what they did to Romney because of his folder of women to which he wanted to give opportunity?  They destroyed him!  
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

*No Honesty, No Integrity… agendas that consistently have at their core nothing other than a quest for the acquisition and maintenance of pure, unadulterated power. My question to all Americans, HOW CAN AMERICAN, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, SUPPORT THIS PARTY?*


If you consider this information helpful or important- Please take a moment to SHARE!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.